<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Help us pick the next WINDSURFING cover!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://windsurfingmag.com/features/2010/07/23/help-us-pick-the-next-windsurfing-cover/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://windsurfingmag.com/features/2010/07/23/help-us-pick-the-next-windsurfing-cover/</link>
	<description>Just another Windsurfingmag.com weblog</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 22:05:52 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Laurids</title>
		<link>http://windsurfingmag.com/features/2010/07/23/help-us-pick-the-next-windsurfing-cover/comment-page-1/#comment-6265</link>
		<dc:creator>Laurids</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Sep 2010 13:40:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://windsurfingmag.com/?p=10720#comment-6265</guid>
		<description>Third one is best i think, look most like &#34; Year i wanna go and see what&#039;s inside!&#34; </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Third one is best i think, look most like &quot; Year i wanna go and see what&#039;s inside!&quot;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert</title>
		<link>http://windsurfingmag.com/features/2010/07/23/help-us-pick-the-next-windsurfing-cover/comment-page-1/#comment-5565</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Aug 2010 06:17:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://windsurfingmag.com/?p=10720#comment-5565</guid>
		<description>first one is refreshing and should sell mags to those who don&#039;t even care about windsurfing. The other two are good but very typical. Nice to see something new. I would have trouble throwing away the first cover. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>first one is refreshing and should sell mags to those who don&#039;t even care about windsurfing. The other two are good but very typical. Nice to see something new. I would have trouble throwing away the first cover.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: same</title>
		<link>http://windsurfingmag.com/features/2010/07/23/help-us-pick-the-next-windsurfing-cover/comment-page-1/#comment-5282</link>
		<dc:creator>same</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Aug 2010 08:18:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://windsurfingmag.com/?p=10720#comment-5282</guid>
		<description>the second one </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>the second one</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: andres</title>
		<link>http://windsurfingmag.com/features/2010/07/23/help-us-pick-the-next-windsurfing-cover/comment-page-1/#comment-4763</link>
		<dc:creator>andres</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Aug 2010 01:23:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://windsurfingmag.com/?p=10720#comment-4763</guid>
		<description>the second one is the best </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>the second one is the best</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

